Full Body Pro

Pros & Cons

At a Glance

Overview

Infrared Plus is another heat-centric infrared therapy brand, similar to UTK but positioned slightly lower in price ($299–399). Their full-body panel emphasizes far-infrared (FIR) heating over photobiomodulation, marketing themselves as a 'whole-body healing device' rather than a clinical RLT panel.

This is an important positioning distinction. While Mito, Hooga, and BONTANNY are optimizing for light frequency and irradiance density, Infrared Plus is optimizing for thermal comfort and heat penetration depth. The result is a device that looks like a full-body panel but functions more like an infrared sauna blanket — pleasant, potentially therapeutic, but not equivalent to clinical-grade RLT.

For users who explicitly want warmth-based therapy with some incidental RLT benefit, Infrared Plus delivers value. For users chasing photobiomodulation science, the heat-first design is a compromise.

Technology: Jade, Tourmaline & FIR Emission

Infrared Plus uses jade and tourmaline stone technology similar to UTK, emitting far-infrared (FIR) in the 4–14 micron wavelength range alongside minimal near-infrared (850nm+) light. The stones are heated via resistive wire coils to approximately 40–50°C (104–122°F), which triggers FIR emission.

FIR penetrates skin and muscle more deeply than visible light but through thermal conduction, not photonic stimulation. Clinical evidence supports FIR for pain relief, circulation improvement, and inflammation modulation — but through a different mechanism than RLT. The confusion arises because both modalities claim health benefits; they're just different pathways.

Infrared Plus doesn't prominently advertise near-infrared (850nm) photonic output, which is telling. Their FIR output dominates, with 850nm light as a bonus, not the focus. This is fine if you want heat therapy; it's misleading if you're buying for pure photobiomodulation.

Coverage & Practical Use

Full-body coverage: 30"–36" wide, long enough for torso or legs. You can use it lying down (under the panel) or standing in front of it. Setup is straightforward — just plug in and wait 5–10 minutes for the stones to reach temperature.

Typical sessions are 20–30 minutes, longer than LED-based RLT (10–15 minutes). This reflects the slower heating mechanism: you're waiting for thermal energy to penetrate, not instantly bombarding tissue with photons.

Power draw is 300–400W, similar to mid-range LED panels. But most of that power goes to heating stones, not producing clinically significant light.

Noticeable warmth and sweating during sessions (not in a sauna-intense way, but noticeable). Some users find this pleasant and relaxing; others prefer the cool, quiet experience of LED-based RLT.

Efficacy: Heat vs. Light

For pain management and circulation improvement, Infrared Plus's thermal benefits are real. Whole-body heat increases blood flow, reduces muscle tension, and modulates inflammation through vasodilation. Users with arthritis, fibromyalgia, or chronic muscle tightness report genuine relief.

For ATP production, collagen synthesis, and photobiomodulation-specific benefits, the light component is too weak. If you're chasing these effects, LED-based RLT (Mito, Hooga, BONTANNY) is more effective. Infrared Plus's incidental 850nm light is a bonus, not the primary mechanism.

The practical difference: Mito and Hooga deliver cumulative benefits from frequent short sessions (3–5x per week, 10–15 minutes). Infrared Plus works better as a less-frequent deeper heat therapy (2–3x per week, 20–30 minutes). Different protocols, different goals.

Build & Durability Concerns

Similar to UTK: jade and tourmaline stones are durable but brittle. Thermal stress (rapid heating/cooling) can cause micro-fractures. Heating elements (resistive coils) are the failure point — users report degradation after 1–2 years of regular use.

Control interface is typically mechanical dials (temperature, timer) rather than digital displays. This simplicity is good for durability (fewer electronics to fail) but bad for precision. You can't dial in exact temperatures or program custom protocols.

Warranty is typically 1 year, covering manufacturing defects but not wear-and-tear failure of coils. Repairs are expensive ($150–300) and not covered. This makes long-term cost-of-ownership higher than the upfront price suggests.

Price & Value: Heat Therapy vs. RLT

At $299–399, Infrared Plus is cheaper than Mito MEGA ($749) and Hooga ULTRA1500 ($849), but comparable in price to Hooga HG1000 ($589) and BONTANNY BO-300 ($249).

The value depends entirely on your goals. If you want full-body heat therapy with incidental RLT, Infrared Plus is fine. If you want clinical-grade RLT with incidental warmth, you're paying mid-range prices for budget-grade light output.

Vs. Hooga HG1000 ($589): You save $190–290 but lose 200 LEDs and significantly higher irradiance. Hooga is substantially more powerful for RLT; Infrared Plus is more powerful for heat. Different products.

Frequently Asked Questions

Compare With Similar Red Light Therapy Devices

Head-to-Head Comparisons